From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 12, 2023
No. 23-6287 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

23-6287

10-12-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVON KELLY BENNETT, a/k/a Scooter, Defendant-Appellant.

Davon Kelly Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 20, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00020-D-RJ-1; 2:20-cv-00037-BO)

Davon Kelly Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Davon Kelly Bennett seeks to appeal the district court's orders and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Bennett's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 12, 2023
No. 23-6287 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVON KELLY BENNETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

Citations

No. 23-6287 (4th Cir. Oct. 12, 2023)