From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Benford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 5, 2012
Case No. 1:91-cr-108 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:91-cr-108

11-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID LEBRON BENFORD


JUDGE MATTICE


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on November 6, 2012, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision (Petition) of U.S. Probation Officer Daniel Haimelin and the Warrant for Arrest issued by U.S. District Harry S. Mattice, Jr. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Scott Winne for the USA.
(2) Defendant DAVID LEBRON BENFORD.
(3) Attorney Anthony Martinez for defendant.
(4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.

After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing and detention hearing.

AUSA Winne moved defendant be detained pending a hearing to determine whether his term of supervision should be revoked.

Findings


(1) Based upon U.S. Probation Officer Haimelin's petition and defendant's waiver of preliminary hearing and detention hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the petition.

Conclusions


It is ORDERED:

(1) The defendant shall appear in a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice, Jr.
(2) The motion of AUSA Winne that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Mattice is GRANTED.
(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing before Judge Mattice on Monday, November 19, 2012, at 2 pm.

ENTER.

______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Benford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Nov 5, 2012
Case No. 1:91-cr-108 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 5, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Benford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID LEBRON BENFORD

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Nov 5, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:91-cr-108 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 5, 2012)