From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bello

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
19 Cr. 144 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

19 Cr. 144 (AKH)

12-14-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO, Defendant.


ORDER

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, United States District Judge

On September 16, 2022, Samark Lopez Bello (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss the Indictment. ECF No. 253. In his briefing, Defendant argued (i) that he does not fall within the class of persons chargeable under the Kingpin Act, (ii) that the presumption against extraterritoriality precludes his charges under both the Kingpin Act and 18 U.S.C. § 371, and (iii) that the Government has not properly alleged a Klein conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371. (ECF No. 255, at 4-20). The Government declined to address the merits of these arguments in its opposition brief, instead asking me o exercise my discretion under the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to decline to entertain Defendant's challenges to the Indictment.

Without reaching any decision regarding fugitive disentitlement, I request that both parties fully brief the merits of Defendant's motion. The Government shall file a supplemental opposition brief addressing the merits of Defendant's motion to dismiss the Indictment no later than January 13, 2023. The Government shall file its Reply no later than February 3, 2023.

The oral argument previously scheduled on January 4, 2023 is adjourned to March 28, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bello

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
19 Cr. 144 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Bello

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

19 Cr. 144 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)