From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 19, 2024
4:21-CR-00168-02-LPR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:21-CR-00168-02-LPR

03-19-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. ELMER BELL DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P.RUDOIFSKY' UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. 109) is DENIED.

Defendant did not receive “status points” at sentencing, so retroactive guideline Amendment 821 does not change his guideline range.

Additionally, Defendant's plea agreement “waive[d] the right to have the sentence modified pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ” Because Defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into his plea agreement, including this waiver, he is not entitled to relief.

Doc. 88.

United States v. Cowan, 781 Fed.Appx. 571 (8th Cir. 2019) (affirming dismissal of a § 3582 (c)(2) motion when the record establish that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered the plea agreement).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bell

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 19, 2024
4:21-CR-00168-02-LPR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. ELMER BELL DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 19, 2024

Citations

4:21-CR-00168-02-LPR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2024)