From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bell

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 2, 2021
15-cr-20089-1 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

15-cr-20089-1

06-02-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMHAL MOSES BELL, Defendant.


REVISED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION REQUESTING A JUDICIAL RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING LENGTH OF RRC/HALFWAY HOUSE PLACEMENT (ECF NO. 173)

This order corrects typographical errors in the Court's initial order denying Bell's motion. (See Order, ECF No. 175.) On page two of that order, the Court mistakenly referred to Bell as “Hobbs.” The Court has corrected that error in this revised order.

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 6, 2015, Defendant Lamhal Moses Bell pleaded guilty to three offenses: a Hobbs Act robbery on January 18, 2015, using a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence (his Hobbs Act robbery on January 18, 2015), and a Hobbs Act robbery on February 1, 2015. (See Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF No. 55, PageID.136; Judgment, ECF No. 104, PageID.614.) Bell's sentencing guidelines range was 141 to 155 months imprisonment. (See Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF No. 55, PageID.138, 150.) On December 15, 2015, this Court sentenced Bell to 114 months imprisonment: 30 months for each Hobbs Act robbery offense, to be served concurrently; and 84 months for using a firearm during and in relation to the first Hobbs Act robbery offense, to be served consecutively to his robbery counts. (See Judgment, ECF No. 104, PageID.614-615.)

On March 16, 2021, Bell filed a motion in which he requested that the Court recommend to the Bureau of Prisons that he be placed in a residential re-entry and/or halfway house 12 months prior to the end of his sentence. (See Mot., ECF No. 173.) Bell filed a similar motion less than a year ago, and the Court denied that motion in a written order. (See Order, ECF No. 168.) For all of the same reasons that the Court denied Bell's initial motion for a recommendation, Bell's current motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bell

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 2, 2021
15-cr-20089-1 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMHAL MOSES BELL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

15-cr-20089-1 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2021)