From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 14, 2015
CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-77-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Dec. 14, 2015)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-77-JTM-JEM

12-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SPENCER BELL, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT SPENCER BELL TO: THE HONORABLE JAMES T. MOODY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Spencer Bell's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge John E. Martin on December 9, 2015, with the consent of Defendant Bell, counsel for Defendant Bell, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Bell's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Bell under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Bell,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Bell understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Bell understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Bell understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Bell understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Bell has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Bell is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Bell understands that his answers may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Bell's plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Spencer Bell's plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Bell be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Bell be adjudged guilty, sentencing before Senior Judge James T. Moody will be set at a later date by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED this 14th day of December, 2015.

s/ John E. Martin

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN E. MARTIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cc: All counsel of record

Honorable James T. Moody


Summaries of

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 14, 2015
CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-77-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Dec. 14, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SPENCER BELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 14, 2015

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CR-77-JTM-JEM (N.D. Ind. Dec. 14, 2015)