From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Beets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 2, 2012
No. 3:12-CR-097 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CR-097

11-02-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEVIN ANDREW BEETS


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This criminal case is before the court on the defendant's motion for a continuance of his November 8, 2012 trial date [doc. 13]. Therein, the defendant states that his counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial. The government has filed no opposition to the motion.

The court finds the motion well-taken, and it will be granted. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the motion outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). In light of the reasoning set forth by the defendant, the court finds that the failure to grant the motion would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The motion requires a delay in the proceedings. Therefore, all the time from the filing of the motion to the new trial date is excludable as provided by the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

It is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's motion [doc. 13] is GRANTED, and this criminal case is CONTINUED to Tuesday, February 12, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. The new plea cutoff date is January 29, 2013.

ENTER:

Leon Jordan

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Beets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Nov 2, 2012
No. 3:12-CR-097 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Beets

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEVIN ANDREW BEETS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-CR-097 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 2, 2012)