From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Beck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jan 26, 2018
No. 17-1709 (3d Cir. Jan. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-1709

01-26-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH BECK, Appellant


NOT PRECEDENTIAL On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Criminal Action No. 2-14-cr-00247-012)
District Judge: Honorable Mark R. Hornak Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
January 16, 2018 Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

The Government met its burden of proving Beck violated the conditions of release on the basis of the positive drug test on January 11, 2017. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1. That test was listed on the Government's pre-hearing petition, thus any further notice deficiencies cannot amount to clear error for lack of prejudice. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993). The District Court's judgment revoking Beck's supervised release is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Beck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Jan 26, 2018
No. 17-1709 (3d Cir. Jan. 26, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Beck

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH BECK, Appellant

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 26, 2018

Citations

No. 17-1709 (3d Cir. Jan. 26, 2018)