Opinion
Case No: 91-cr-00188-LTB-19 USM No: 90380-011
10-24-2011
United States of America v. milton beasley
Raymond P. Moore, FPD Defendant's Attorney
Date of Previous Judgment: January 29, 2009
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)
Raymond P. Moore, FPD
Defendant's Attorney
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of × the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
[] DENIED. × GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 292months is reduced to 235 months I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Previous Offense ¦36 ¦Amended Offense Level:¦34 ¦ ¦Level: ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------------+---------------+----------------------+---------------¦ ¦Criminal History ¦V ¦Criminal History ¦V ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦ +----------------------+---------------+----------------------+---------------¦ ¦Previous Guideline ¦292 to 365 ¦Amended Guideline ¦235 to 293 ¦ ¦Range: ¦months ¦Range: ¦months ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
× The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.
[] Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Should the defendant not have a stable residence upon his release from custody, the defendant shall reside in a Residential Reentry Center (RRC) for a period of up to 120 days as directed by his probation officer, and shall observe the rules of that facility. The defendant shall be released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons within ten days of the effective date of this order. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated January 19, 1998 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lewis T. Babcock
Judge's signature
Effective Date: November 1, 2011
(if different from order date)
Lewis T. Babcock, Senior United States District Judge
Printed name and title