From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bazzle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 23, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 11-74 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 11-74

03-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRONE BAZZLE


ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence and Statements, and upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Disclosure of the Identity and Information Pertaining to the Confidential Informant, the Government's responses thereto, following a suppression hearing on March 19, 2012, and for the reasons provided in this Court's Memorandum dated March 23, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for disclosure (Document No. 19) is DENIED.

2. Defendant's motion to suppress (Document No. 20) is DENIED.

BY - THE COURT:

___________

Berle M. Schiller , J.


Summaries of

United States v. Bazzle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 23, 2012
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 11-74 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bazzle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRONE BAZZLE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 11-74 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Sawyers

Moreover, this case is one in which the informant played an active role in the events underlying Defendant's…