From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Baxter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2021
Case No. 2:13-cr-20494 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cr-20494

02-08-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRELL SHAWNTA BAXTER, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR HOME CONFINEMENT [36]

The Honorable Patrick J. Duggan sentenced Defendant Terrell Shawnta Baxter to 188 months in prison for distribution of child pornography. ECF 30, PgID 111-13. Recently, Defendant sent a letter to the Court and explained that he is not seeking compassionate release but was "merely seeking the possibility of doing the reminder [sic] of [his] sentence in home detention." ECF 36, PgID 135.

The case was then reassigned to the undersigned and the Court ordered the Government to respond. ECF 37. The Government has since responded. ECF 38. Because Defendant is pro se, the Court will liberally construe Defendant's letter as a motion to serve the rest of his sentence in home confinement. See Spotts v. United States, 429 F.3d 248, 250 (6th Cir. 2005) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972) (per curiam) (requiring courts to construe pro se filings liberally)).

Under the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), the Court may reduce a defendant's term of imprisonment. But the First Step Act "does not authorize the district court to order that a defendant serve his already-imposed sentence in home confinement." United States v. Mattice, No. 20-3668, 2020 WL 7587155, at *2 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 331 (2011)). Instead, the Bureau of Prisons "has sole discretion to transfer an inmate to home confinement." Id. (citations omitted). Because the Court lacks the authority to grant Defendant's requested relief, the Court will deny the motion for home confinement.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for home confinement [36] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Stephen J. Murphy, III

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge Dated: February 8, 2021 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on February 8, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/ David P. Parker

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Baxter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 8, 2021
Case No. 2:13-cr-20494 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Baxter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERRELL SHAWNTA BAXTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 8, 2021

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cr-20494 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2021)