Opinion
No. 10-30215 D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00133-SEH
12-22-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACKSON BRYANT BAUGUS, Defendant - Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).
--------
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Jackson Bryant Baugus appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Baugus contends that the district court improperly applied $7,724 in seized funds to an unsatisfied fine of $75,000 imposed in connection with his 2004 criminal judgment. Contrary to Baugus's contention, the district court did not err. See 18 U.S.C. § 3613(c). Consideration of Baugus's remaining claims is precluded pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata. See Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 892 & n.5 (2008); United States v. Bhatia, 545 F.3d 757, 759 (9th Cir. 2008); see also United States v. Baugus, Nos. 07-30046 and 07-30353, 2009 Westlaw 159228 (9th Cir. Jan 13, 2009).
AFFIRMED.