Opinion
No. 1:19-CR-120-H-BL
06-19-2020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DONALD MATTHEW BASTA, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER REFERRING THE ISSUE OF DETENTION TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court are the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge. As no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and Basta is hereby adjudged guilty of Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) and 2252A(b)(1). Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order. The Court now refers the issue of mandatory detention pending sentencing to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Parker.
1. Background
The Indictment charges a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) and 2252A(b)(1), that is Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography. On June 4, 2020, Basta pled guilty to the charge. The Honorable Magistrate Judge Parker recommended that the plea be accepted. Having accepted that recommendation, Basta has now been adjudged guilty of Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography.
2. Legal Standard Governing Mandatory Detention
Title 18 United States Code, Section 3143(a)(2) mandates detention after a guilty plea if the offense of conviction is among those listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)(A)-(C). Section 3142(f)(1)(A) details three categories of crime—a crime of violence, a violation of Section 1591, or an offense listed in Section 2332b(g)(5)(B). Here, Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography is a crime of violence.
A crime of violence is defined, among other things, as a felony under Chapters 77, 109A, 110, or 117 of Title 18. 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4). Chapter 110 includes the statute of conviction at issue in this case—18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) and 2252A(b)(1).
Section 3143(a)(2) details two exceptions to mandatory detention for defendants awaiting imposition or execution of a sentence. The defendant must be detained unless "(A)(i) the judicial officer finds there is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted; or (ii) an attorney for the Government has recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed on the person; and (B) the judicial officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community." Id. Additionally, a person otherwise "subject to detention under Section 3143(a)(2), and who meets the conditions of release set forth in Section 3143(a)(1) or (b)(1), may be ordered released, under appropriate conditions, by the judicial officer, if it is clearly shown that there are exceptional reasons why such person's detention would not be appropriate." 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).
The Court thus refers this matter to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Parker to determine whether Section 3143(a)(2)'s or Section 3145(c)'s exceptions are satisfied.
3. Conclusion
The issue of mandatory detention for this offense is referred to Magistrate Judge Parker for resolution.
So ordered on June 19, 2020.
/s/_________
JAMES WESLEY HENDRIX
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE