From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Basham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 27, 2012
CR No.: 4:02-922-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CR No.: 4:02-922-JFA

02-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANDON LEON BASHAM


ORDER MODIFYING ORDER OF


(ECF No. 1448)

For good cause shown, the time within which the defendant must respond to this court's inquiry regarding his desire to pursue this action is hereby extended for an additional 10 days, making a response due on or before March 10, 2012. Additionally, the response may be submitted by the defendant through counsel. Any response submitted by counsel, however, should include the following notarized attestation clause wherein the defendant indicates his consent to the position articulated by counsel:

I, Brandon Leon Basham, hereby state under oath that the foregoing statement of my intentions, advanced by my attorneys, full, adequately, and correctly characterizes my position on the question posed by the court regarding my desire to pursue this action.

_____________

Brandon Leon Basham

Sworn to before me this _

day of _, 2012.

Notary Public for _

My Commission Expires:_

IT IS SO ORDERED. February 27, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina

_____________

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Basham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Feb 27, 2012
CR No.: 4:02-922-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Basham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANDON LEON BASHAM

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CR No.: 4:02-922-JFA (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 2012)