From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bartlett

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 23, 2022
No. 21-30190 (9th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21-30190

11-23-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALAN M. BARTLETT, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted November 15, 2022

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska No. 3:13-cr-00044-RRB-1 Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding

Before: CANBY, CALLAHAN, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

Alan M. Bartlett appeals pro se the district court's order denying his "Motion to Allow Limited Contact While No-Contact Order is in Effect." We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bartlett contends that the district court violated his right to due process by denying him permission to contact certain trial witnesses despite a 2015 no-contact order. We disagree. The district court had the authority to issue and maintain the no-contact order, see Wheeler v. United States, 640 F.2d 1116, 1123-24 (9th Cir. 1981), and Bartlett has identified no meritorious basis upon which the order should be lifted or modified.

Appellant is informed that the docket is correct.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant's motions for oral argument are, therefore, denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Bartlett

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 23, 2022
No. 21-30190 (9th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Bartlett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALAN M. BARTLETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

No. 21-30190 (9th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)