From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bartlett

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1934
73 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1934)

Opinion

No. 7408.

October 26, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Wm. P. James, Judge.

Peirson M. Hall, U.S. Atty., Mansel G. Gallaher, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Ernest D. Fooks, Atty. Dept. of Justice, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D.C., Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Thomas E. Walsh, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Armistead L. Boothe, Atty. Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C.

Wm. H. Wilson and Wm. Christensen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.


The record in this case does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank et al. v. National City Bank of New York (C.C.A.) 69 F.2d 312. This being the only assignment of error presented by the appellant, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Bartlett

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 26, 1934
73 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1934)
Case details for

United States v. Bartlett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William v. BARTLETT, Appellee

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 1934

Citations

73 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1934)