From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barron

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 7, 1998
138 F.3d 809 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 96-36058, 96-36059

Filed April 7, 1998

D.C. Nos. CV-96-00096-JKS, CR-91-0015-1-JKS

D.C. Nos. CV-96-00072-HRH CR-00148-HRH

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of non-recused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 1997), amended by slip. op. 1867 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublished disposition, United States v. Thompson, 131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir. 1997), are withdrawn.

These cases are consolidated for rehearing en banc.


Summaries of

United States v. Barron

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 7, 1998
138 F.3d 809 (9th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

United States v. Barron

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM SCOTT BARRON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 1998

Citations

138 F.3d 809 (9th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) (rendering the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory).See…

U.S. v. Boroian

28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Post-conviction proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 are treated as civil actions, hence…