From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barrino

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 23, 2024
3:16-CR-0309-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)

Opinion

3:16-CR-0309-RJC-DCK

02-23-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIS BARRINO, Defendant, and TODD STEGALL TRUCKING COMPANY, Garnishee.


ORDER

David C. Keesler, United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Government's “Motion For Dismissal Of Order Of Continuing Garnishment” (Document No. 23) filed February 22, 2024. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will grant the motion.

The Government asserts that the “Order Of Continuing Garnishment” (Document No. 22) should be dismissed “against the Defendant as to the Garnishee for reason that the Defendant's restitution debt has been paid in full.” (Document No. 23).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's “Motion For Dismissal Of Order Of Continuing Garnishment” (Document No. 23) is GRANTED. The Order of Continuing Garnishment filed in this case against Defendant as to the Garnishee is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Barrino

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 23, 2024
3:16-CR-0309-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Barrino

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIS BARRINO, Defendant, and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2024

Citations

3:16-CR-0309-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2024)