From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barrera-Medina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 282 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted September 18, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Jon K. Vincent, Phillip A. Talbert, Esq., USSAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Victor S. Haltom, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-00213-3-MCE.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, the government's unopposed motion for summary affirmance of the district court's judgment is granted.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Barrera-Medina

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 282 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Barrera-Medina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elias Miguel…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 282 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Berrera-Medina

On September 25, 2006, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the district court's sentence.…