From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Banegas-Pacheco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 10, 2012
Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00343-PAB (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00343-PAB

02-10-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. JOEL MELKIN BANEGAS-PACHECO, Defendant.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] filed by defendant pro se on February 8, 2012. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). In this case, the defendant is represented by counsel. As a result, defendant's pleading is improper. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] is STRICKEN.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Banegas-Pacheco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 10, 2012
Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00343-PAB (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Banegas-Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. JOEL MELKIN BANEGAS-PACHECO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00343-PAB (D. Colo. Feb. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Marquez v. United States

It is inappropriate for Petitioner to file motions pro se when he is represented by counsel. See Williams v.…