From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Banchs

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Dec 1, 2021
6:20-CR-06046 EAW (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-CR-06046 EAW

12-01-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EVELYN BANCHS, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD Chief Judge United States District Court

Defendant Evelyn Banchs (“Defendant”) stands accused by way of a Superseding Indictment returned on March 25, 2021, with one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). (Dkt. 119). This Court referred all pretrial matters in the case to United States Magistrate Judge Mark W. Pedersen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). (Dkt. 190).

On November 8, 2021, Magistrate Judge Pedersen issued a thorough Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court deny Defendant's pretrial motions (Dkt. 172) to suppress evidence and for a hearing, and to dismiss the indictment based on insufficiency, selective prosecution, and vindictive prosecution. (See Dkt. 192). Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the parties had 14 days after being served a copy of the Report and Recommendation to file objections. Neither party has filed objections.

The Court is not required to review de novo those portions of a report and recommendation to which objections were not filed. Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) (“Failure to object in accordance with this rule waives a party's right to review.”); see Molefe v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 602 F.Supp.2d 485, 487 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (to trigger the de novo review standard, objections to a report “must be specific and clearly aimed at particular findings in the magistrate judge's proposal”).

Notwithstanding the lack of objections, the Court has conducted a careful review of the Report and Recommendation as well as the filings previously made in the case, and finds no reason to reject or modify the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pedersen. Therefore, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. (Dkt. 192). For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this Court denies Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment and motion for a hearing and to suppress evidence. (Dkt. 172).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Banchs

United States District Court, Western District of New York
Dec 1, 2021
6:20-CR-06046 EAW (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Banchs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. EVELYN BANCHS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

6:20-CR-06046 EAW (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)