From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Baltierra-Frausto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 7, 1973
472 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 72-2946.

January 17, 1973. Certiorari Denied May 7, 1973.

Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge Lewis A. Wenzell (argued), San Diego, Cal., for defendant and appellant.

Douglas G. Hendricks, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff and appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior District Judge.

Honorable William M. Byrne, Sr., United States Senior District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.


This case of conspiracy to import marijuana is affirmed. The whole defense concerned the admission into evidence of the defendant's oral confession. We find the ruling admitting the statements was quite proper. The Miranda warning was adequate and given twice. On the first warning, the waiver was equivocal. But the oral waiver was not equivocal on the second warning. There was no duty to give a third warning or to lecture the defendant on the elements of the warning.

Therefore, the trial judge's hearing of some evidence from the co-defendant with Baltierra-Frausto absent was not prejudicial, although it was improper procedure. Cf. Singleton v. United States, 381 F.2d 1, 9 Cir., 1967, cert. denied 389 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 601, 19 L.Ed.2d 673, 1967.


Summaries of

United States v. Baltierra-Frausto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 7, 1973
472 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

United States v. Baltierra-Frausto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, v. VICENTE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 7, 1973

Citations

472 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Hayton v. Egeler

Clearly the federal rule is not so rigid and would apply the harmless error rule even when it is the taking…