From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ballentine

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 22, 1957
245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957)

Opinion

Docket 24623.

May 22, 1957.

James Ballentine, pro se.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.


As the attorney assigned by us on March 25, 1957 has examined the transcript of the testimony at the trial and given the matter as a whole careful consideration and reports that he can find no merit whatever in the appeal and wishes to be relieved, we accede to his request.

Appellant's application for the assignment of new counsel is denied. United States ex rel. Tierney v. Richmond, 2 Cir., 245 F.2d 222.

Appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file a brief and appendix pro se is granted and he may file same at any time on or before September 1, 1957.


Summaries of

United States v. Ballentine

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
May 22, 1957
245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957)
Case details for

United States v. Ballentine

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James BALLENTINE, Defendant-Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 22, 1957

Citations

245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

Such has been the ruling of this court in cases in which the applicable law seems plain. United States ex…

United States v. Jackson

Motion denied. United States ex rel. Jones v. Richmond, 2 Cir., 245 F.2d 234; United States ex rel. Tierney…