From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2017
CASE No. 1:16CR262 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2017)

Opinion

CASE No. 1:16CR262

02-22-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON A. BALLARD, Defendant.


JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to General Order 99-49, this case was referred on February 9, 2017, to United States Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert for the purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties, Defendant Jason A. Ballard's proffer of a plea of guilty, conducting the colloquy prescribed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, causing a verbatim record of the proceedings to be prepared, conducting a presentence investigation, and submitting a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation stating whether the plea should be accepted and a finding of guilty entered. ECF Dkt. #18. The following, along with the transcript or other record of the proceedings submitted herewith, constitutes the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation concerning the plea of guilty proffered by Defendant Ballard.

1. On February 22, 2017, Defendant Jason A. Ballard, accompanied by Assistant Federal Public Defender Jacqueline A. Johnson, executed a consent to referral of his case to a United States Magistrate Judge for the purpose of receiving his guilty plea.

2. Defendant Ballard then proffered a plea of guilty to the sole count of the Indictment.

3. Prior to such proffer, Defendant Ballard was examined as to his competency, advised of the charges and consequences of conviction, informed that the Court is not bound to apply the Federal Sentencing Guidelines but must consult the guidelines and take them into consideration when it imposes the sentence and of the possibility of a departure from the Guidelines, notified of his rights, advised that he was waiving all of his rights except the right to counsel, and, if such were the case, his right to appeal, and otherwise provided with the information prescribed in Fed. Crim. R. 11.

4. The undersigned was advised that a written plea agreement existed between the parties, and no other commitments or promises have been made by any party, and no other written or unwritten agreements have been made between the parties.

5. The undersigned questioned Defendant Ballard under oath about the knowing, intelligent, and voluntary nature of the plea of guilty, and the undersigned believes that Defendant Ballard's plea was offered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.

6. The parties provided the undersigned with sufficient information about the charged offense and Defendant Ballard's conduct to establish a factual basis for the plea.

In light of the foregoing, and the record submitted herewith, the undersigned concludes that Defendant Ballard's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and all requirements imposed by the United States Constitution and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 have been satisfied.

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the plea of guilty be accepted and a finding of guilty be entered by the Court as to the sole count of the Indictment. Date: February 22, 2017

/s/George J . Limbert

George J. Limbert

United States Magistrate Judge

ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of service of this notice. Fed. R. Crim. P. 59. Failure to file objections within the specified time constitutes a WAIVER of the right to appeal the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.


Summaries of

United States v. Ballard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 22, 2017
CASE No. 1:16CR262 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Ballard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JASON A. BALLARD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 22, 2017

Citations

CASE No. 1:16CR262 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 22, 2017)