From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Balcar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
543 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

Submitted October 15, 2013

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00046-PMP. Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding.

For UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee: Camille W. Damm, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLV - OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY, Las Vegas, NV; Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USRE - OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY, Reno, NV.

FERDINAND RICHARD BALCAR, Jr., Defendant - Appellant, Pro se, Mendota, CA.


Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Federal prisoner Ferdinand Richard Balcar, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court's order granting his motion to adjust his restitution payment schedule. We affirm.

Balcar contends that his 1997 jury conviction for four counts of armed bank robbery should be vacated because the government failed to prove at trial that the institutions he robbed were federally insured. Because he raises no challenges to the order being appealed, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Balcar

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 22, 2013
543 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Balcar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FERDINAND RICHARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

543 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2013)