From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Baker

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 10, 2024
1:22CR726 (1) (N.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

1:22CR726 (1)

01-10-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASSIUS BAKER Defendant.


DONALD C. NUGENT JUDGE

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JENNIFER DOWDELL ARMSTRONG MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to General Order 99-49, this matter has been referred to me for the purpose of receiving, after consent, Cassius Baker's (“Defendant's”) guilty plea to Counts 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of the Superseding Indictment. The following, along with the transcript or other record of the proceedings, constitutes my Report and Recommendation concerning Defendant's guilty plea:

1. Defendant, accompanied by counsel, entered a plea of guilty under oath on January 10, 2024;
2. I examined Defendant as to his competency to participate in a plea proceeding and found him to be competent;
3. Defendant stated he was satisfied with the advice, competence, and efforts of his lawyer;
4. Defendant acknowledged understanding the nature of the charges contained in the indictment and the maximum possible sentence;
5. Defendant was advised of the following rights: to tender a plea of not guilty or stand upon such a plea previously entered; to trial; to representation by counsel, including appointed counsel, at all stages of the proceedings; to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses; to present witnesses and to compel their presence; to compel production of exhibits or documents for trial on his behalf; and to waive the privilege against self-incrimination. Defendant acknowledged he understood that if a plea of guilty was accepted, all of these rights would be waived;
6. Defendant was advised that the government would have the right, in a prosecution for perjury, to use any statement he makes under oath;
7. The parties provided me with sufficient information about the charged offenses and Defendant's conduct to establish a factual basis for the plea;
8. I find that Defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement;
9. I questioned the Defendant under oath and find that the Defendant's plea was offered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.

In light of the foregoing and the record submitted herewith, I find that all requirements imposed by the United States Constitution and Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 have been satisfied. Accordingly, I recommended that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea and enter a plea of guilty.

ANY OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986).


Summaries of

United States v. Baker

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Jan 10, 2024
1:22CR726 (1) (N.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASSIUS BAKER Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

1:22CR726 (1) (N.D. Ohio Jan. 10, 2024)