Opinion
CR 13-10-GF-BMM-JTJ
02-12-2020
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
I. Synopsis
Defendant Oney J. Baker (Baker) has been accused of violating the conditions of his supervised release. Baker admitted all of the alleged violations. Baker's supervised release should be revoked. Baker should be placed in custody for 7 months, with 29 months of supervised release to follow. Baker should receive credit for time served in state custody. Baker should serve the first 6 months of supervised release at a secure inpatient drug treatment facility such as True North in Billings, Montana.
II. Status
Baker pleaded guilty to being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm on May 16, 2013. (Doc. 25). The Court sentenced Baker to 67 months of custody, followed by 3 years of supervised release. (Doc. 50). Baker's current term of supervised release began on May 17, 2019. (Doc. 56 at 1).
Petition
The United States Probation Office filed an Amended Petition on November 1, 2019, requesting that the Court revoke Baker's supervised release. (Doc. 56). The Amended Petition alleged that Baker had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by failing to attend substance abuse treatment; 2) by failing to attend substance abuse testing; 3) by failing to report to his probation officer as directed; 4) by failing to notify his probation officer of a change in residence; and 5) by committing another crime.
Initial appearance
Baker appeared before the undersigned for his initial appearance on February 11, 2020. Baker was represented by counsel. Baker stated that he had read the petition and that he understood the allegations. Baker waived his right to a preliminary hearing. The parties consented to proceed with the revocation hearing before the undersigned.
Revocation hearing
The Court conducted a revocation hearing on February 11, 2020. Baker admitted that he had violated the conditions of his supervised release: 1) by failing to attend substance abuse treatment; 2) by failing to attend substance abuse testing; 3) by failing to report to his probation officer as directed; 4) by failing to notify his probation officer of a change in residence; and 5) by committing another crime. The violations are serious and warrant revocation of Baker's supervised release.
Baker's violations are Grade C violations. Moore's criminal history category is V. Baker's underlying offense is a Class C felony. Baker could be incarcerated for up to 24 months. Baker could be ordered to remain on supervised release for up to 36 months, less any custody time imposed. The United States Sentencing Guidelines call for a term of custody of 7 to 13 months.
III. Analysis
Baker's supervised release should be revoked. Baker should be incarcerated for 7 months, with 29 months of supervised release to follow. This sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary.
IV. Conclusion
The Court informed Baker that the above sentence would be recommended to United States District Judge Brian Morris. The Court also informed Baker of his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their issuance. The Court explained to Baker that Judge Morris would consider a timely objection before making a final determination on whether to revoke his supervised release and what, if any, sanction to impose. Baker stated that he wished to waive his right to object to these Findings and Recommendations, and that he wished to waive his right to allocute before Judge Morris. The Court FINDS:
That Oney J. Baker violated the conditions of his supervised release: by failing to attend substance abuse treatment; by failing to attend substance abuse testing; by failing to report to his probation officer as directed; by failing to notify his probation officer of a change in residence; and by committing another crime.The Court RECOMMENDS:
That the District Court revoke Baker's supervised release and commit Baker to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons for 7 months, with 29 months of supervised release to follow. Baker should receive credit for time served in state custody. Baker should serve the first 6 months of supervised release at a secure inpatient drug treatment facility such as True North in Billings, Montana.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT TO FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO OBJECT
The parties may serve and file written objections to the Findings and Recommendations within 14 days of their entry, as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A United States district court judge will make a de novo determination regarding any portion of the Findings and Recommendations to which objection is made. The district court judge may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the Findings and Recommendations. Failure to timely file written objections may bar a de novo determination by the district court judge, and may waive the right to appear and allocute before a district court judge.
DATED this 12th day of February, 2020.
/s/_________
John Johnston
United States Magistrate Judge