From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bailey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 23, 1968
389 F.2d 63 (4th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

Nos. 11634, 11635 and 11728.

Argued January 9, 1968.

Decided January 23, 1968.

Joseph L. Lyle, Jr., Lynchburg, Va. (Court-appointed counsel) [Hickson, Davies Lyle, Lynchburg, Va., on brief], for appellant Bailey.

John R. Alford, Lynchburg, Va. (Court-appointed counsel) [Caskie, Frost, Davidson Hobbs, Lynchburg, Va., on brief], for appellant Millhouse.

Myer Koonin, Washington, D.C. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant Tyler.

Thomas B. Mason, U.S. Atty., and Robert S. Irons, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.

Before BRYAN, WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.


Appealing against their convictions in the District Court for bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113, in Lynchburg, Virginia on June 28, 1966, John Lee Bailey, Lester Dean Millhouse and Oscar Tyler, Jr., all assign trial procedural errors, and Millhouse and Tyler additionally question the sufficiency in law of the proof of their guilt. We find no substantial mistakes of procedure and find evidence aplenty to sustain the judgments.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Bailey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 23, 1968
389 F.2d 63 (4th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

United States v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John Lee BAILEY, Appellant. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 23, 1968

Citations

389 F.2d 63 (4th Cir. 1968)