United States v. Baidar

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMIULLAH BAIDAR

Court: United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

1:22-mj-01007-MJS (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-mj-01007-MJS

01-05-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMIULLAH BAIDAR

Matthew J. Skahill, United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELE CONFERENCING

Matthew J. Skahill, United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other: