From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bah

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 15-13271 (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-13271

08-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

United States v. Bah

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 15-13271 (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Bah

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 29, 2016

Citations

No. 15-13271 (11th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)