From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Babayan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2016
Case No. ED CV 16-1961 BRO - SP (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 16-1961 BRO - SP

09-22-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARMEN BABAYAN, Defendant.

Presented By: EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division Valerie L. Makarewicz Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for the United States of America


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Hearing: 10/24/2016
Courtroom: 7C

Upon the Petition and supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and the supporting Declaration to the Petition, the Court finds that Petitioner has established its prima facie case for judicial enforcement of the subject Internal Revenue Service ("IRS" and "Service") summons. See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58, 85 S.Ct. 248, 13 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964); see also Crystal v. United States, 172 F.3d 1141, 1143-1144 (9th Cir. 1999); United States v. Jose, 131 F.3d 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1997); Fortney v. United States, 59 F.3d 117, 119-120 (9th Cir. 1995) (the Government's prima facie case is typically made through the sworn declaration of the IRS agent who issued the summons); accord, United States v. Gilleran, 992 F.2d 232, 233 (9th Cir. 1993).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent appear before this District Court of the United States for the Central District of California in Courtroom of the Honorable Beverly Reid O'Connell, No. 7C, XXX United States Courthouse

350 West First Street, Courtroom 7C

Los Angeles, California 90012

On October 24, 2016, at 9:00 A.M, and show cause why the testimony and production of books, papers, records and other data demanded in the subject Internal Revenue Service summons should not be compelled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this Order, the Petition, Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and accompanying Declaration be served promptly upon Respondent by any employee of the Internal Revenue Service or by the United States Attorney's Office, by personal delivery, or by leaving copies of each of the foregoing documents at the Respondent's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there, or by certified mail.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days after service upon Respondent of the herein described documents, Respondent shall file and serve a written response, supported by appropriate sworn statements, as well as any desired motions. If, prior to the return date of this Order, Respondent files a response with the Court stating that Respondent does not desire to oppose the relief sought in the Petition, nor wish to make an appearance, then the appearance of Respondent at any hearing pursuant to this Order to Show Cause is excused, and Respondent shall be deemed to have complied with the requirements of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all motions and issues raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order. Only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by sworn statements filed within ten (10) days after service of the herein described documents will be considered by the Court. All allegations in the Petition not contested by such responsive pleadings or by sworn statements will be deemed admitted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

Dated: September 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Presented By: EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
THOMAS D. COKER
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division /s/_________
Valerie L. Makarewicz
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for the United States of America


Summaries of

United States v. Babayan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2016
Case No. ED CV 16-1961 BRO - SP (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Babayan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARMEN BABAYAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. ED CV 16-1961 BRO - SP (C.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2016)