Opinion
23-3178 23-3179 23-3180 23-3181 23-3182 23-3183 23-3184 23-3186 23-3187 23-3188 23-3189 23-3190 23-3192 23-3193 23-3194 23-3195 23-3196 23-3197 23-3198 23-3199 23-3200 23-3201 23-3202 23-3203 23-3204 23-3205 23-3206 23-3207 23-3208 23-3209 23-3210 23-3211 23-3213
10-31-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADRIAN AYALA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NOHEMY BOBADILLA-OLIVA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERNANDO CABRAL TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAMIEN CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JONATHAN DEHAVEN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARENCE BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RONALD D. CATRELL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY L. IRVIN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIO ALBERTO FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NICHOLAS LOLAR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TANYA JONES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JULIE CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOMINGO MONTES-MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIAN K. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERNANDO GUEVARA-GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DARUS D. MEBANE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE ANTONIO NUNEZ-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERADIS RODRIGUEZ-TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDUARDO PONCE-SERRANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NICHOLAS SOTO-CAMARGO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE MARIN SORIANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASEN LOWELL THURMAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANILLE MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAQUEL ODEGBARO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QUIAN YOUNGER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUIS VILLA-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SERGIO ZAMUDIO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESUS VERA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTOR VELAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OSCAR VIVEROS-AVECIAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE TORRES-AYALA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTONIO VAZQUEZ-SAENZPARDO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NINCY SARAHI ZELAYA-PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant.
(D.C. Nos. 2:19-CV-02491-JAR, 5:18-CV-04103-JAR-JPO, 5:16-CR-40002-DDC-1) (D. Kan.) 2:21-CV-2109-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20031-JAR-4) (D. Kan.), 2:19-CV-2298-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20031-JAR-8) (D. Kan.) 2:18-CV-02414-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20011-JAR-1) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02474-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20041-JAR- 1) (D. Kan.), 2:20-CV-02002-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20014-JAR-4) (D. Kan.), 2:19-CV-02408-JAR-JPO, 2:11-CR-20125-DDC-1) (D. Kan.) 2:19-CV-02046-JAR-JPO, 2:13-CR-20070-DDC-5) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02415-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20061-JAR-8) (D. Kan.), 2:19-CV-02393-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20012-JAR-DJW-2) (D. Kan.) 2:18-CV-02254-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20091-JAR-1) (D. Kan.), 2:19-CV-02411-JAR-JPO, 2:14-CR-20014-KHV-2) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02464-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20020-JAR-2) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02434-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20030-JAR-1) (D. Kan.) 2:21-CV-02427-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20017-DDC-1) (D. Kan.) 2:18-CV-02413-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20041-JAR-3) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02503-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20061-JAR-1) (D. Kan.) 2:19-CV-02398-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20091-JAR-2) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02378-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20022-JAR-3) (D. Kan.), 2:18-CV-02416-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20001-JAR-1) (D. Kan.) 5:18-CV-04105-JAR-JPO 5:16-CR-40012-DDC-2) (D. Kan.) (D.C. Nos. 2:19-CV-02106-JAR-JPO; 2:19-CV-02491-JAR, 2:16-CR-20008-DDC-7) (D. Kan.) (D.C. Nos. 2:19-CV-02191-JAR-JPO; 2:19-CV-02491-JAR, 2:16-CR-20008-DDC-3) (D. Kan.) 2:18-CV-02422-JAR-JPO, 2:15-CR-20061-JAR-6) (D. Kan.) 2:20-CV-02254-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20031-JAR-3) (D. Kan.) 2:20-CV-02431-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20031-JAR-2) (D. Kan.) 2:19-CV-02399-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20008-DDC-5) (D. Kan.) 2:18-CV-0417-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20017-DDC-2) (D. Kan.) 2:21-CV-02107-JAR-JPO, 2:16-CR-20031-JAR-5) (D. Kan.)
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [*]
These matters are before us on the Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Consolidate, Expedite, and Resolve Appeals, wherein they each request a certificate of appealability (COA) on the question whether the district court erred by relying on United States v. Spaeth, 69 F.4th 1190 (10th Cir. 2023) and Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (1973) to dismiss their 28 U.S.C. § 2255 sentencing challenges. Appellants bring these appeals to challenge only the Spaeth-based dismissal of their § 2255 sentencing challenges based on the Kansas USAO's pre-plea collection of their attorney-client communications. They do not intend to challenge any other aspect of the district court's resolution of their § 2255 motions. Appellants acknowledge that, absent a COA, these appeals must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). They also acknowledge that this court is bound by Spaeth.
This order addresses only Appellants' request for a COA. The request to consolidate and for other case management actions contained in the motion has been addressed by separate order.
Appellants' request for a COA is foreclosed by Spaeth. Accordingly, we deny a COA and dismiss these matters.
[*] This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.