From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Aversa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA)

01-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH AVERSA

JONATHAN ROMANKOW Assistant U.S. Attorney MICHAEL J. O'DONNELL, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Joseph Aversa


Honorable Douglas Arpert


ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having been opened to the Court by Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jerse\ (Jonathan W. Romankow, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant JOSEPH A VERSA (Michael J. O'Dounell, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-caplioned matter; and three continuances having previously been granted; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter presented to a Grand Jury within thirty (30) days of the date of his arrest pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §3161; and the defendant through Ills attorney having waived such rights and consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown.

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

1. Pica negotiations currently are in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to enter a plea in Court, which would thereby render trial of this matter unnecessary.
2. Defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance.
3. The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources.
4. Pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A). the ends of justice served by granting die continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

WHEREFORE, on this 8th day of _______________, 2012;

ORDERED that tte proceedings in the above-captioned matter arc continued from December 21, 2012 through February 19, 2033; and it is further

ORDERED that the period between from December 21, 2012 through February 19, 2013 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

_______________

HON. DOUGLAS ARPERT

United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry
consented to:
_______________
JONATHAN ROMANKOW
Assistant U.S. Attorney
_______________
MICHAEL J. O'DONNELL, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant Joseph Aversa


Summaries of

United States v. Aversa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 8, 2013
Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Aversa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH AVERSA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

Mag. No. 12-2547 (DA) (D.N.J. Jan. 8, 2013)