From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Avagyan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-00169-KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00169-KJM

08-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARMENAK AVAGYAN, a.k.a. ALEX SAMS Defendant.

MATTHEW G. MORRIS Assistant United States Attorney JOSEPH A. WELCH Attorney for Armenak Avagyan


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MATTHEW G. MORRIS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE TO

SEPTEMBER 8, 2011, AND

EXCLUDING TIME FOR PURPOSES OF

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Matthew G. Morris and Defendant, Armenak Avagyan, by and through his attorney, Joseph A. Welch, hereby stipulate as follows:

The parties agree that the case be continued to September 8, 2011. The parties request the continuance based upon the following facts, which the parties believe demonstrate good cause to support the appropriate finding under the Speedy Trial Act:

a) The parties are attempting to determine the bounds of a possible resolution to the case without trial. The Defense will require time to consider and respond to certain offers made by the government.

b) The requested continuance is not based on congestion of the Court's calendar, lack of diligent preparation on the part of the attorney for the government or the defense, or failure on the part of the attorney for the government to obtain available witnesses.

For purposes of computing the date under the Speedy Trial Act by which defendant's trial must commence, the parties agree that the time period of July 28, 2011 to September 8, 2011, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) because the delay results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request, without government objection, on the basis of the Court's finding that: (i) the delay will allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare; and (ii) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

MATTHEW G. MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

JOSEPH A. WELCH

Attorney for Armenak Avagyan

IT IS SO ORDERED, the court having found that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Avagyan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cr-00169-KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Avagyan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARMENAK AVAGYAN, a.k.a. ALEX SAMS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00169-KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)