From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Autagavia

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 17, 2015
2:15 mj 179 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, LINDA HARTER, Chief Assistant for the Federal Defender, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, GEORGE AUTAGAVIA.


          REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR TRANSPORTATION ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 4285

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, District Judge.

         BACKGROUND

         Mr. Autagavia was charged in March of last year with driving a motor vehicle while impaired. The charges were filed in federal court in North Carolina (case no. 5:14-mj-02034-JG-1). Mr. Autagavia received notice of a warrant. In response he promptly self-surrendered to the U.S. Marshal's Office for the Eastern District of California on August 31, 2015. He was put on calendar before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. He was then released on his own recognizance to return the following day for bail review. On September 1, 2015, Mr. Autagavia's release was affirmed along with supervision by pre-trial services.

         On September 1, 2015 Mr. Autagavia expressed an interested in resolving his case in this district under the provisions of Rule 20. The government opposed that request. Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman then ordered Mr. Autagavia to appear in federal court in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Mr. Autagavia is scheduled to appear in federal court in Fayetteville, North Carolina at 08:00 A.M. on October 7, 2015.

         Mr. Autagavia is indigent. Mr. Autagavia is unable to afford his own transportation from Sacramento, California to Fayetteville, North Carolina. It will be necessary for Mr. Autagavia to depart prior to October 7, 2015 to timely make this appearance. Mr. Autagavia will also need return transportation from Fayetteville, North Carolina to Sacramento, California on or after October 7, 2015.

         LAW

         If the Court finds that the defendant is "financially unable to provide the necessary transportation to appear before the required court on his own" then the Court may order the U.S. Marshal Service to arrange for the person's noncustodial transportation to appear in court. The U.S. Marshal Service may also be authorized to provide money for subsistence as provided for under 5 U.S.C. §5702(a). See 18 U.S.C. § 4285. This statute applies even where a defendant must travel to "another judicial district in which criminal proceedings are pending". 18 U.S.C. §4285.

         REQUEST

         The facts presented do indicate that the defendant would not be able to pay for the cost of his transportation to the Eastern District of North Carolina for his required court appearance as set by the Eastern District of North Carolina. Accordingly, Mr. Autagavia requests that this Court order payments pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4285 for transportation from Sacramento, California to the court in Fayetteville, North Carolina and subsistence. Mr. Autagavia also requests this Court order return transportation from Fayetteville, North Carolina to Sacramento, California on or after October 7, 2015. A hearing on this matter is not requested.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR TRANSPORTATION ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 4285

         TO: UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA:

         This is to authorize and direct you to furnish the above named defendant, GEORGE AUTAGAVIA, with transportation and subsistence expenses for travel from Sacramento, California to Fayetteville, North Carolina to timely make his appearance on October 7, 2015 at 8:00 A.M. Mr. Autagavia will also need return transportation to his residence on or after October 7, 2015. The United States Marshal must furnish Mr. Autagavia with money for subsistence expenses to and from his destination, not to exceed the amount authorized as a per diem allowance for travel under section 5702(a) of Title 5, United States Code. This order is authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4285.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Autagavia

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 17, 2015
2:15 mj 179 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Autagavia

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE AUTAGAVIA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 17, 2015

Citations

2:15 mj 179 KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2015)