From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Aughtry

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Sep 17, 2021
Crim. Action 2:21-CR-16 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

Crim. Action 2:21-CR-16

09-17-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARRIE A. AUGHTRY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE [DKT. NO. 49],

ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

THOMAS S. KLEEH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 25, 2021, the Defendant Carrie A. Aughtry (“Aughtry”), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Four of the Indictment, charging her with Distribution of Methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C., Sections 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). This Court referred Defendant's plea of guilty to the magistrate judge for the purpose of administering the allocution, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted. Aughtry stated that she understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and Aughtry consented to pleading before the magistrate judge.

Based upon Defendant Aughtry's statements during the plea hearing and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Defendant Aughtry was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that she was aware of the nature of the charges against her and the consequences of her plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case (“R&R”) [Dkt. No. 49] finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Defendant Aughtry's plea of guilty to Count Four of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge released Defendant on the terms of the Order Setting Conditions of Release. [Dkt. No. 10].

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither the Defendant nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [Dkt. No. 49], provisionally ACCEPTS Defendant Aughtry's guilty plea, and ADJUDGES her GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Four of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence investigation report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Aughtry, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;

2. The Government and Defendant Aughtry shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by September 24, 2021;

3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Defendant Aughtry, counsel for Defendant, and the Government on or before November 23, 2021; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before December 7, 2021;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before December 17, 2021; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing memorandum or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before January 7, 2022.

The Court further ORDERS that prior to sentencing, counsel for Defendant review with her the revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions adopted by this Court on November 29, 2016, pursuant to the standing order entered by Chief Judge Groh, In Re: Revised Standard Probation and Supervised Release Conditions, 3:16-MC-56.

The Court will conduct the Sentencing Hearing for Defendant on January 21, 2022, at 3:00 P.M., at the Elkins, West Virginia point of holding court. If counsel anticipates having multiple witnesses or an otherwise lengthy sentencing hearing, please notify the Judge's chamber staff so that an adequate amount of time can be scheduled.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies.


Summaries of

United States v. Aughtry

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Sep 17, 2021
Crim. Action 2:21-CR-16 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Aughtry

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CARRIE A. AUGHTRY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

Crim. Action 2:21-CR-16 (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 17, 2021)