From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Artfitch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 14, 2012
Criminal Action No. 09-697 (SRC) (D.N.J. May. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 09-697 (SRC)

05-14-2012

UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES ARTFITCH, Defendant.


ORDER

CHESLER, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the motion to file an appeal out of time by Defendant James Artfitch. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A) states that a criminal defendant has 14 days after judgment to file a notice of appeal. Judgment in this criminal case was entered on November 28, 2011. Defendant filed his motion to file an appeal out of time on January 26, 2012. This Court's ability to enlarge the time for appeal is limited by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4), which states: "Upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may -- before or after the time has expired, with or without motion and notice -- extend the time to file a notice of appeal for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(b)."

As the Government points out, even if this Court found good cause, it has no power to extend the period for appeal beyond approximately January 12, 2012. Because Defendant's motion was filed almost two weeks after this final deadline passed, Defendant's motion must be denied.

For these reasons,

IT IS on this 14th day of May, 2012,

ORDERED that Defendant's motion for leave to appeal out of time (Docket Entry No. 46) is DENIED.

__________________

Stanley R. Chesler, U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

United States v. Artfitch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 14, 2012
Criminal Action No. 09-697 (SRC) (D.N.J. May. 14, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Artfitch

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES ARTFITCH, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: May 14, 2012

Citations

Criminal Action No. 09-697 (SRC) (D.N.J. May. 14, 2012)