From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arteaga-Loayza

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 14, 2021
Crim. 21-327 and 19-517 (D.N.J. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

Crim. 21-327 19-517

09-14-2021

UNITED STATES v. JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING FOR FELONY PLEAS AND/OR SENTENCINGS

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[√] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

SEE ATTACHMENT A.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:

ATTACHMENT A

The Court finds that the sentencing hearing for defendant JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA to be held on September 14, 2021, cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following reasons:

1. To ensure that the Court is not overwhelmed by cases and proceedings at the conclusion of this period of emergency. Currently, District Judges in New Jersey handle a substantially larger docket of cases than Judges in other Districts in the United States. New criminal cases continue to be assigned by the Court during the emergency. If the Court cannot resolve matters now by guilty plea and sentencing, the resulting backlog will overwhelm the Court's ability to function effectively. The concern of such congestion and the particular harm that likely will be caused by delays in the processing of cases and matters in the future is particularly acute in this emergency, at least given that: (1) it is unknown when this emergency will subside and when the Court will be able to function at normal capacity; and (2) this District's preexisting shortage of District Court Judges which already has challenged the Court's ability to process and resolve cases. This District currently has four District Judge vacancies, all of which have been pending for more than a year. The Federal Judicial Conference has deemed the District's vacancies judicial emergencies.
2. To permit defendant JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA to obtain a speedy resolution of his case through timely sentencing to afford appropriate punishment and rehabilitation. Defendant JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA has asked for this case to be resolved today by way of his timely sentencing.
3. To permit the Government to obtain a resolution of the case so that the Government, already operating in a restricted capacity due to the emergency, may appropriately focus its resources on other, emerging criminal matters. The Government has also asked for this case to be resolved today by way of defendant JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA's timely sentencing.
4. To prevent overcrowding at the facilities housing pre-trial detainees. The detention facilities have a limited capacity. Detainees are
transferred from the detention facilities to prison facilities only after they have been found guilty and sentenced. There is a constant influx of new detainees admitted to the detention facilities. If detainees, such as defendant JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA, cannot be timely sentenced and transferred to prison facilities, the resulting backlog of detainees will overwhelm the detention facilities.


Summaries of

United States v. Arteaga-Loayza

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 14, 2021
Crim. 21-327 and 19-517 (D.N.J. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Arteaga-Loayza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. JASON ARTEAGA-LOAYZA

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

Crim. 21-327 and 19-517 (D.N.J. Sep. 14, 2021)