From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arredondo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 29, 2015
2:12-CR-00128 WBS (E.D. Cal. May. 29, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, United States of America.

          MARK REICHEL, ESQ., Counsel for Defendant.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING SENTENCING HEARING

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         STIPULATION

         Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant Gerardo ARREDONDO, by and through his counsel of record, Mark Reichel, Esq., stipulate and agree that the currently-scheduled judgment and sentencing hearing for this defendant on June 1, 2015, should be continued to June 22, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. The requested continuance will provide the parties additional time to fully brief significant sentencing objections raised by defendant's formal objections. The additional time will provide the parties an opportunity to meet and confer to determine whether it is possible for the defendant to withdraw his sentencing objections in favor of a joint sentencing memorandum or the government will prepare and file its formal responses to defendant's objections.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Based upon the representations and stipulation of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The judgment and sentencing hearing for defendant Gerardo ARREDONDO on June 1, 2015, is VACATED; and

2. Judgment and sentencing for this defendant is reset for June 22, 2015, at 9:30 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Arredondo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 29, 2015
2:12-CR-00128 WBS (E.D. Cal. May. 29, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Arredondo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERARDO ARREDONDO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 29, 2015

Citations

2:12-CR-00128 WBS (E.D. Cal. May. 29, 2015)