From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arnette

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2021
2:08-CR-0016 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:10-CR-0011

06-14-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID LEE ARNETTE, Defendant.


DETENTION ORDER (VIOLATION OF PRETRIAL RELEASE, PROBATION OR SUPERVISED RELEASE)

DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

[ ] After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (violation of pretrial release order), the court finds:

[ ] there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a federal, state or local crime while on
release and defendant has not rebutted the presumption that his/her release will endanger another or
the community or
[ ] there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated another condition of J release
and
[ ] based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety of another person or the community or
[ ] the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(D), 46(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3148.

[X] After a hearing pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or supervised release) the court finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has violated a condition of probation or supervised release and the defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to another person or to the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3143.

IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4) defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his/her counsel. Upon further order of a court of the United States or request of an attorney for the United States the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.


Summaries of

United States v. Arnette

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 14, 2021
2:08-CR-0016 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Arnette

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID LEE ARNETTE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

2:08-CR-0016 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)