From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 25, 2012
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB

06-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. RICHARD KELLOGG ARMSTRONG, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the United States' Motion for Forfeiture Money Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture [#564] filed June 22, 2012, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court having read said Motion and being fully advised in the premises finds as follows.

"[#564]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

On April 30, 2012, a jury found defendant Richard K. Armstrong guilty of Counts One, Six through Nine, Thirteen through Sixteen, Twenty-Five through Twenty-Seven, and Twenty-Eight in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 286, 287, 1341, 1957, and 2, which convictions provide a factual basis and cause to issue a forfeiture order under 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(1), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) for the following assets:

a. a $1,637,481.61 money judgment, representing the amount proceeds obtained by the defendant, less any funds obtained from the forfeiture of directly traceable assets;
b. real property, including all attachments and fixtures, located at 14255 Harvest Mile Road, Brighton, Colorado;
c. real property, including all attachments and fixtures, located at 30 Perkins Drive, Prescott, Arizona; and
d. Beech Aircraft A36, FAA Registration Number N5509Y, Serial Number E-2527.

Based on the evidence introduced at trial, the Court finds the requisite nexus exists between the assets listed above and the offenses for which defendant Richard K. Armstrong was convicted.

Prior to the disposition of the assets, the Internal Revenue Service, or its designated sub-custodian, is required to seize the forfeited property and provide notice to any third parties pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED:

1. That the United States' Motion for Forfeiture Money Judgment and Preliminary Order of Forfeiture [#564] filed June 22, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That defendant's interest in the following:

a. a $1,637,481.61 money judgment, representing the amount proceeds obtained by the defendant, less any funds obtained from the forfeiture of directly traceable assets;
b. real property, including all attachments thereto, located at 14255 Harvest Mile Road, Brighton, Colorado;
c. real property, including all attachments thereto, located at 30 Perkins Drive, Prescott, Arizona; and
d. Beech Aircraft A36, FAA Registration Number N5509Y, Serial Number E-2527
is forfeited to the United States in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(1), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

3. That pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(4), this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment;

4. That the Internal Revenue Service, or its designated sub-custodian, is directed to seize the property subject to forfeiture, and is directed further to make its return as provided by law;

5. That the United States shall publish notice of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) via a government website for thirty consecutive days, and shall make its return to this Court that such action has been completed;

6. That on adjudication of all third-party interests, if any, the Court will enter a Final Order of Forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(1), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) and Rule 32.2(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure , in which all interests will be addressed;

7. That the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and adjudicate the interests of all third-parties in ancillary proceedings; and

8. That, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture may be amended pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e)(1).

Dated June 25, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 25, 2012
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. RICHARD KELLOGG ARMSTRONG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB (D. Colo. Jun. 25, 2012)