From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 28, 2011
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-02 (D. Colo. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-02

11-28-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. RICHARD KELLOGG ARMSTRONG, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER STRIKING NOTICE

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Notice to the Clerk of the Court, Gregory C. Langham, To Enter Petitioner's Documents Into Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-2 And 10-cv-01073-MSK-MEH [#363] filed November 23, 2011, by defendant, Richard Kellogg Armstrong. I strike the notice.

"[#363]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

As I have done assiduously during the time that Mr. Armstrong has represented himself, I construe his papers liberally. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Belmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972)).

During the proceedings on April 7, 2011, I admonished and instructed Mr. Armstrong, to cease and desist from filing notices in lieu of motions. I rehearsed this requirement in the order [#235] I entered on May 17, 2011. See Order [#235] at 6-7, ¶ 3. a. I reiterated this requirement in the order [#241] I entered May 31, 2011. See Order [#241] at 2. I perseverated this requirement in the order [#251] I entered June 10, 2011. See Order [#251] at 2.

Notwithstanding my oral and written orders, Mr. Armstrong filed the "notice" [#363] described above. The filing by Mr. Armstrong of this latest notice has not been authorized by the court. Thus, his unauthorized and contumacious notice will be stricken as violative of my oral and written orders. Additionally, I will reiterate and asseverate my orders that Mr. Armstrong cease and desist from filing notices in lieu of motions and that he not file any additional pretrial motions without advance leave of this court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Notice to the Clerk of the Court, Gregory C. Langham, To Enter Petitioner's Documents Into Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-2 And 10-cv-01073-MSK

MEH [#363] filed November 23, 2011, by defendant, Richard Kellogg Armstrong, is stricken;

2. That once again the defendant, Richard Kellogg Armstrong, subject to the penalties for contempt of court:

a. shall not file any paper as a "notice" (as opposed to and distinguished from a "motion") without advance leave of the court; and
b. shall not file any pretrial motion without advance leave of the court;and

This proscription does not affect the filing of any motion authorized during the status conference conducted on November 1, 2011. See Courtroom Minutes [#347] filed November 1, 2011, at 3, ¶¶ 5, 6, and 7.
--------

3. That this order supplements and ratifies the related, extant orders [#235], [#241], and [#251] entered by the court.

Dated November 28, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Robert E. Blackbum

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 28, 2011
Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-02 (D. Colo. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2. RICHARD KELLOGG ARMSTRONG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

Criminal Case No. 10-cr-00317-REB-02 (D. Colo. Nov. 28, 2011)