From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2018
Case No. 17-mc-50464 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-mc-50464

07-31-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR ARMSTRONG, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM THE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT (ECF No. 26)

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's second motion for relief from the garnishments imposed as a result of a restitution order. (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set out in the Court's July 19, 2018 Opinion and Order, Defendant's request is denied. (ECF No. 25)

Additionally, because of Defendant's repeated filings for the same relief the Court has denied, Defendant shall seek leave of Court (ask permission in writing) before he may file any motion before this Court seeking relief from the writ of garnishment.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion (ECF No. 26) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall seek leave of Court before he may file any motion before this Court seeking relief from the writ of garnishment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Linda V. Parker

LINDA V. PARKER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 31, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, July 31, 2018, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail.

s/ R. Loury

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Armstrong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2018
Case No. 17-mc-50464 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR ARMSTRONG, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-mc-50464 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2018)