From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arms Textile Manufacturing Co.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 13, 1961
200 F. Supp. 102 (D.N.H. 1961)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 2147.

July 13, 1961.

Maurice P. Bois, U.S. Atty., Concord, N.H., John M. Burzio, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for United States.

Booth, Wadleigh, Langdell, Starr Peters, Frederic Greenhalge, Manchester, N.H., for intervener.

McLane, Carleton, Graf, Greene Brown, Robert A. Raulerson, Manchester, N.H., for defendant Arms Textile Mfg. Co.

Devine, Millimet McDonough, Joseph A. Millimet and Norman H. Stahl, Manchester, N.H., for defendants New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co., Pandora Knitwear, Inc., and S B Stores, Inc.


Preliminary Statement

Petition of J. Morton Rosenblum, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Brewster Hotel Corporation, to intervene in action brought under section 6332(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 6332(b), alleging that after Notice of Levy served on debtors within four months of the date of bankruptcy, the plaintiff did not reduce its claims to possession.


There appears to be no dispute in the facts disclosed in the pleadings and the pertinent question is whether the proposed intervener is entitled to any relief under Rule 24(a)(3), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. The sole issue is whether the levy which was concededly made was sufficient to entitle the government to the funds without further action thereon. It is my view that the United States, in dealing with an intangible, has done everything that was necessary and possible under its Notice of Levy. I am constrained to adopt the holding of United States v. Eiland, 4 Cir., 223 F.2d 118, for the purpose of acting on this petition and rule that the notice served on the debtor did, in fact, take into possession the funds sought. Such precluded any interest or right the petitioner could have in the pending action.

The petition to intervene is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Arms Textile Manufacturing Co.

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Jul 13, 1961
200 F. Supp. 102 (D.N.H. 1961)
Case details for

United States v. Arms Textile Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. ARMS TEXTILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY; New…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Jul 13, 1961

Citations

200 F. Supp. 102 (D.N.H. 1961)

Citing Cases

In re San Fernando Val. Restaurants Inc.

When an action was filed by the government to enforce payment, the Court granted a motion for summary…