From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arenas

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jul 28, 2021
No. 21-1172 (D.N.J. Jul. 28, 2021)

Opinion

21-1172

07-28-2021

UNITED STATES v. JACOB ARENAS


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFFRENCING

Anthony R. Mautone United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 43(b)(2) and Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds: [X] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

[X] That the proceeding(s) to be held today cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice, for the following specific reasons:

1. COVID pandemic, 2, Inability to conduct in-person hearing for indefinite period, and 3. Consent of defendant.

Accordingly, the proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[X] Video Teleconferencing

[] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Arenas

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jul 28, 2021
No. 21-1172 (D.N.J. Jul. 28, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Arenas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. JACOB ARENAS

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1172 (D.N.J. Jul. 28, 2021)