From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. CRS 10-0390 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CRS 10-0390 EJG

08-10-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ Defendants.

DINA L. SANTOS Attorney for Defendant FRANCISCO ARRELLANO-RODRIGUEZ HEIKO COPPOLA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


DINA L. SANTOS, Bar #204200

A Professional Law Corporation

Attorney for Defendant

FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING

DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND

EXCLUDING TIME

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Garcia

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney HEIKO COPPOLA, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Dina L. Santos, Counsel for Defendant FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ, that the

status conference scheduled for August 12, 2011, be vacated and the matter be continued to this Court's criminal calendar on October 14, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., for further status and possible change of plea.

This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit further diligent examination of possible defenses, investigation, further client consultation concerning available courses of action, and to continue in negotiations with the government in an attempt to reach an acceptable plea agreement. More investigation is necessary and will require the defense investigator to travel to the location of the alleged marijuana gardens to measure the distance between each garden.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et. seq. be tolled pursuant to § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local code T-4 (time to prepare), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court is advised that all counsel have conferred about this request, that they have agreed to the October 14, 2011 date, and that Mr. Coppola has authorized Ms. Santos to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DINA L. SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

FRANCISCO ARRELLANO-RODRIGUEZ

HEIKO COPPOLA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

Hon. Edward J. Garcia

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. CRS 10-0390 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. CRS 10-0390 EJG (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)