From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arellano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CASE NO. 12cr2120-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12cr2120-BEN

07-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARICELA SANCHEZ-DELGADO (1) Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

X an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or

_ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or

_ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or

_ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or

_ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or

_ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;

x of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment: 21:952 and 960; 18:2 - Importation of Methamphetamine; Aiding and Abetting (Felony)

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

_____________

William McCurine, Jr.

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Arellano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CASE NO. 12cr2120-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Arellano

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VANESSA MARIE ARELLANO (2…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12cr2120-BEN (S.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)