From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Archie

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-16980 (9th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-16980

01-25-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LINDA ARCHIE, Defendant-Appellant.


D.C. Nos. 3:17-cv-00724-MMD 3:14-cr-00013-MMD-WGC
District of Nevada, Reno ORDER Before: CANBY and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied because appellant has not shown that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the [section 2255 motion] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003).

Any pending motions are denied as moot.

DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Archie

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-16980 (9th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Archie

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LINDA ARCHIE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 18-16980 (9th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)