Opinion
S3 16 Cr. 371 (RA)
05-13-2022
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT
HONORABLE RONNIE ABRAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2018, DEVON ARCHER (the “Defendant”), among others, was charged in an Indictment, S3 16 Cr. 371 (RA) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count One) and securities fraud, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff (Count Two);
WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and Two of the Indictment seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. Section 2461(c), which authorize the forfeiture of any and all property, real and personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, on or about June 28, 2018, the Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Government asserts that $15,700,513 in United States currency represents the amount of property traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained;
WHEREAS, the Government seeks a money judgment in the amount of $15,700,513 in United States currency representing, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the money judgments entered against co-defendants, Jason Galanis, Gary Hirst, John Galanis, Bevan Cooney and Michelle Morton in this case, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant;
WHEREAS, the Court finds that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $15,700,513 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the money judgments entered against co-defendants, Jason Galanis, Gary Hirst, John Galanis, Bevan Cooney and Michelle Morton in this case, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon entry of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, DEVON ARCHER, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the “United States Marshals Service, ” and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007, and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.