From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Aravalo Galvan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2006
171 F. App'x 117 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted March 8, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Laurel J. Montoya, USF--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ramiro J. Lluis, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Jorge Alberto Aravalo Galvan appeals from the 210-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, manufacturing methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Aravalo Galvan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 14, 2006
171 F. App'x 117 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Aravalo Galvan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Jorge Alberto ARAVALO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

171 F. App'x 117 (9th Cir. 2006)